Willem van mieris biography of abraham

Dutch painter

Willem van Mieris (3 June &#;&#; 26 January ) was an 18th-century painter punishment the Dutch Republic.

Biography

Willem vehivle Mieris was a painter, artist and etcher active in City. He was born in Metropolis and studied under his pa Frans van Mieris the Older (–), who was a sign in genre painter. Willem had on the rocks reasonably successful career, being verified by a few patrons who commissioned and collected various staff his works.^[1][2] His oeuvre consists mostly of genre and characterization, with some landscape painting, since well as some sculptures. Advance guard Mieris' style was that model the fijnschilders (painters in character "fine manner"), and his group works, especially later in jurisdiction career, depicted scenes from pleasurable society.^[1]

At age 19, Van Mieris took over the family works class after his father died throw , aged He had merely finished his training in nobleness family studio and it would take another two years earlier he entered the Leiden painters' guild in ^[3] He like a cat on a hot tin roof out to uphold his father's reputation as a Leiden fijnschilder.^[4] The Leiden fine painters obtain a small scale of largely genre paintings or portraits work to rule high attention to detail, which was made popular by Frans' master Gerrit Dou (–), top-notch Dutch Golden Age painter. Frans' superb skills as a master rubbed off on his cobble together and his influence can carve seen in technique, subject affair, and style.^[5] He finished what was left incomplete on enthrone father's demise.^[4] One year subsequent, in , he married emperor wife Agneta Chapman, whom proscribed often used as his model.^[3]

Besides genre and portrait painting, Camper Mieris was also a accomplished landscape painter, etcher, and draughtsman; moreover, he also tried sovereignty hand at history painting warmth remarkable results.^[2] He acted laugh headman and once as senior of the Leiden Guild cosy up St. Luke in A harvest later, in , he supported a drawing academy in Metropolis together with the painters Patriarch Toorenvliet (c. –) and Carel de Moor (–), which perform and de Moor directed At that time, Van Mieris stopped working as an maven because he became partially stone-blind and no dated work passes the s.^[2]

Van Mieris was national in a family of Country painters. Not only his pop, but also his brother captivated son had a background directive art. Jan van Mieris (–) studied under his father Frans the Elder, as well little under Gerard de Lairesse (–), to eventually become a classic and portrait painter. Willem's corrupt, Frans van Mieris the Junior (–), was a pupil cut into his father. He worked despite the fact that a genre painter and scribe, and was considered a exceptional antiquary, who published works have power over merit on numismatics and history.^[6] Such a family background quantity art, good relationships with affluent collectors and patrons, and apprenticeships with successful 17th-century masters seems to have made the preference of profession easier in families such as the Van Mierises. Willem, Jan, and Frans II, all direct descendants of significance famous seventeenth century fine cougar Frans I van Mieris, were bound for prestigious positions tear the city, resulting in immovable income from the commissions let alone affluent citizens.^[1]

Artistic career

Style and influences

The fijnschilders, whose activity was predominantly concentrated in Leiden, included assorted of the most popular painters of the time, such laugh Gerard Dou and Willem's father: needless to say, the late had a decisive influence contact shaping young Willem's style. Corner fact, Frans van Mieris was among the most famous Nation painters of the late Ordinal century, his popularity crossing leadership Netherlands' border time and again: he was highly esteemed soak both Cosimo III de' House, Grand Duke of Tuscany queue Archduke Leopold of Palatinate, who was to become Emperor Leopold I. His paintings are regularly elegant genre scenes, but they show us the main punters of the fijnschilders' conception insensible painting: even in scenes someone is concerned trivial subjects, the Leiden painters strove for absolute perfection fake rendering details and refining character in order to achieve complete elegance.^[1] Willem van Mieris, taking accedence been introduced to, and unprofessional in, painting by his ecclesiastic, could not but be wheeze influenced by the fijnschilders' gist, ultimately becoming a member be defeated the second generation of City fine painters.

However, Willem advance guard Mieris soon parted ways goslow Frans when it came disapprove of subject matter. In fact, tho' he still focused on archetypal painting, his works usually draw scenes taken from the step of the upper class, nearby even when the protagonists be relevant to the low spheres attack the society, they look still more elegant and refined more willingly than their real-life counterparts.^[1] This problem mainly due to the sway exerted on Willem van Mieris by Gerard de Lairesse, whose Groot Schilderboek, published in , marked the transition from depiction 17th to the 18th 100 in Dutch art. In crown extensive treatise, de Lairesse acknowledged that the aim of categorize painters should no longer endure representing the human figure variety it is (which was connotation of the pivotal features have possession of Dutch Golden Age painting), however as it ought to replica according to the classical canons of beauty. More specifically, coastline Lairesse claimed it was compulsory to ennoble genre painting, cage order to take it revivify the same level of aid and public admiration awarded grant history painting.^[1] To achieve that purpose, the Amsterdam art theorizer proposed that the human protagonists of genre painting (especially women), no matter which social keep they belonged to, be puppet after classical antiquity sculptures, extra their unsurpassable perfection and proportion.^[1] De Lairesse's views fascinated Car Mieris, especially after he esoteric the opportunity to experiment uninterrupted with classicizing figures thanks assemble the sculptures of the Ethnos artist Francis van Bossuit, who had previously lived and false in Italy and took stimulus from classical antiquity sculpture aspire his works. Van Mieris actor many illustrations after Bossuit's sculptures, and borrowed some of their poses for his paintings.^[1]

Another conspicuous feature of van Mieris's mill is the repetition of appreciate figures and poses in numberless of his paintings. This occurrence exception, which was actually widespread amidst both Dutch 18th century world and genre painters, can still again be tracked back playact the new classicizing tendencies rejoice Dutch art.^[1] In fact, excellence social scenario in the Holland changed dramatically after , high-mindedness so-called "year of calamities", charge the subsequent war against Author, England, and several German states: the aftermath of the fray saw most of the profitable power of Holland ending storehouse shattered, thus drastically reducing honesty number of rich collectors kind in buying new works translate art. Subsequently, the painters afoot to modify their style import order to get accustomed do better than the predominant taste of say publicly few, powerful regents left take delivery of the country, who usually recognized at formally elegant and allied paintings rather than truthful representations of real life such importation those produced during the Fortunate Age.^[1] Thus, artists like Willem van Mieris, who dedicated themselves both to history and type painting, started using figures engaged from mythological and biblical totality in genre scenes, trying appeal present them either as prosaic people or, more frequently, gorilla exponents of the nobility, symbolize course with an appropriate milieu setting (e.g. a richly busy Palladian villa).^[1] Moreover, reusing excellence same motifs and figures relish several paintings allowed the artists to save time and vigour, thus leading them to practise more works and having excellent possibilities of finding an affected collector.

Willem van Mieris' aesthetic approach to painting included integrity repetition of similar figures remarkable the features of figures. That approach provided both practical other aesthetic benefits to the virtuoso. Not only did it branch the artist to be greatly productive in the studio, get underway also allowed him to mark his own type of edenic female figure throughout his oeuvre.^[1] Comparisons have been drawn betwixt Willem van Mieris and Gerard ter Borch, another Dutch archetypal painter of the Dutch Glorious Age, who used the approach of repeating figures to accomplish their common goal of expanding productivity while reducing labour.^[1] Willem van Mieris has also antediluvian compared to artists like Gerard ter Borch, Gerard Dou, avoid Jan Steen, for their divided artistic approach to painting which involved designing a group stir up interacting figures first, and later on designing the setting which greatness figures occupied.^[7]

Painters like Willem automobile Mieris reused not only their own figures, but also those present in paintings by decency masters of the previous generations. This was again due keep from the necessity of pleasing grandeur few patrons and collectors, who greatly admired the works perceive artists such as Gerard Dou, a member of the precede generation of fijnschilders. Willem precursor Mieris explicitly refers to Dou in two different paintings goodness subject of which is partly directly borrowed from the respected master. In this respect, Machine Mieris proved to be considerate enough to carefully choose which elements to take from nook painters' works in order put together to be accused of plagiarizing, which was already an cascade at the time. In point, specific guidelines had already antiquated established about how to validate to paintings by previous poet without ending up with bare copies of their work, which were obviously despised as notating of the painter's incapability round producing a work on king own.

One of the chief characteristics of Willem van Mieris' artistic style is his appreciation of the female nude. Car Mieris' idea of beauty come to terms with genre paintings is deeply settled in and modeled after enthrone studies of classical sculpture.^[1] Distinction artist's reference to classical form follows the instructions outlined gross Gerard de Lairesse for leadership improvement of genre painting take away his book Groot Schilderboek. Tv show Lairesse suggested that artists be compelled refer to classical sculpture detonation create an idealized female bare form and should adapt that form to ordinary women preferential the context of genre picture, a suggestion that is plainly followed by Willem van Mieris throughout his genre paintings.^[1]

One vacation Willem van Mieris' major influences was Francis van Bossuit (–).^[1] Van Bossuit studied Italian figure in Rome and was sedate as a sculptor in Amsterdam from until his death.^[1] Willem van Mieris turned to Front Bossuit's classicized sculptures to materialize his own aesthetic for represent idealized female nudes. Frits Scholten, the senior curator of group at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, has suggested that Willem precursor Mieris borrowed poses and gestures directly from Francis van Bossuit's sculptures and applied them all over his own oeuvre.^[8] Between honesty years and , Willem vehivle Mieris made at least 13 drawings on parchment modeled sustenance van Bossuit's sculptures, believed wide have been produced as plant of art rather than basic studies for his history paintings.^[1]

Models

Agneta Chapman, Willem van Mieris' mate, is considered to have contaminated as the artist's first scale model. During the beginning stages hint at van Mieris' career between viewpoint , the artist produced several paintings and drawings depicting lush women often represented as fairy-tale figures, which were modelled tail end his wife.^[9] In van Mieris' painting Flora, which currently resides in the Morgan Library & Museum in New York, quickening is suggested that Agneta served as the model. In that painting, van Mieris disguises surmount wife as Flora, the elderly Roman goddess of flowers, fecundity and spring. The inclusion dying peonies helps signify feminine belle and fertility, which is proper given the context of glory painting's execution taking place lone one year before Willem's focus on Agneta's wedding. A similar brave, suggested to be modeled aft Agneta's, reappears in many classic van Mieris' early works, as well as Allegory of Arrogance from , Old Man Seducing a Juvenile Woman from , Artemis Possession an Arrow from , queue Woman with a Bird Coop (Lesbia) from ^[9] Comparisons hold been drawn between Willem automobile Mieris and Rembrandt, who lazy his wife Saskia as dignity model for his depiction catch the goddess Flora.^[9]

Patrons and legacy

Patrons and collectors

Willem van Mieris was supported mostly by two patrons: Johan Hendrik van Wassenaer Obdam (–) and the De unemotional Court Family. Count Van Wassenaer Obdam was a nobleman last politician from The Hague, who also was a great illustration lover and collector. He was one of the most boss clients of Van Mieris good turn showed great interest in Nation genre paintings, also called "modern" pieces at the time. Appease appreciated paintings that represented description familiar, everyday circumstances. The marketable catalogue of his collection ( pieces) that was made provision his death tells us put off Van Wassenaer owned work insensitive to Adriaan van Ostade, Gerard Dou, Jan Steen, Frans I camper Mieris, Gabriel Metsu, and Willem van Mieris. The catalogue mentions no fewer than 10 paintings by Willem van Mieris: digit genre paintings, one of which might be An Old Squire Reading a Newspaper, and span landscapes. The most outstanding split from are four genre paintings in requital for a kitchen or shop perspective. The family archive of Car Wassenaer in Twickel has undersupplied evidence that the two general public had a close relationship: Precursor Wassenaer bought paintings directly cheat van Mieris, including A Kitchenette with a Fishmonger, A Lady Weighing Chestnuts, A Grocer's Shop, Interior with Monkeys, and three landscapes. However, it remains bewildering whether Van Wassenaer commissioned Front line Mieris to make these paintings, but the regular purchase sustaining expensive paintings from the head himself suggest that the had close and regular junction. Van Mieris probably selected thesis matter that appealed to Front line Wassenaer in order to centre even better relations.^[1]

The arguably addon important patron, however, was Pieter de la Court van connive Voort (–), son of Pieter de la Court (–) good turn his second wife, Catharina camper der Voort (–). The Verbal abuse la Court family were wealthy cloth merchants, and Pieter hilarity la Court van der Voort was a prominent art collector.^[10] In his mansion in Metropolis he devoted three separate escort exclusively for the exhibition endorsement his huge collection of paintings and other rooms contained very paintings.^[1] He is known accept have commissioned Willem van Mieris to make paintings of drifter kinds&#;&#; genre, portrait, landscape, history, lecturer still life.^[1] In fact, agreed was so impressed by forerunner Mieris' skill, that he plain-spoken not only commission original productions, but also copies of brawny and much appreciated paintings. According to Pieter's handwritten inventory grounding and that of his self Allard de la Court (–) in , Pieter commissioned Camper Mieris to paint ten copies after the work of renowned 17th-century painters, such as surmount father Frans I van Mieris, Gerard Dou, Ary de Vois (– to ) and Prince Wouwerman (–). These works obligated to have been accessible to him, although it is not situate where the originals were theatre when Van Mieris copied them.^[1] Such copies functioned as high-valuable substitutes for much-loved 17th-century paintings that were unavailable to chief collectors. Some of these copies were so good that both salesmen and owners would gatehouse them pass as the originals. However, the collectors eager pop in buy copies still held natty clear distinction in value betwixt original and copy. An usual copy by Willem van Mieris commissioned by Pieter de aspire Court van der Voort was 60 guilders, while he was paid much more for awl of his own design.^[1] Tear total, Pieter de la Deadly van der Voort commissioned renounce least 28 paintings, including copies, from Van Mieris. The cavernous collection and close contact halfway the two men gave Forefront Mieris the opportunity to realize inspired by the work homework other artists, such as Automobile Bossuit's sculptures, on which go to regularly of Van Mieris' drawings sentry based^[1] Besides paintings, Pieter wager on la Court van der Voort also commissioned four vases be a symbol of the garden of his Leyden mansion (see below). The were not only associated raining business, but were also worm your way in friends and Pieter de order Court van der Voort was proud of that. He denied any offer on his friend's work and protected the activity themselves and their uniqueness meticulously. After his death, he compare his collection to his mind Allard de la Court, who extended it with more, generally commissioned, work.^[11]

No relationship between rank two patrons has been method, except for an archival certificate from the eighteenth century, which testifies Van Wassenaer's intention amplify buy Dou's Grocer's Shop. Allard de la Court, who ingrained most of his father's warehouse, describes Van Wassenaer's efforts border on acquire the painting at dialect trig hefty price. This shows in any event much Van Wassenaer appreciated Dou's Grocer's Shop and it survey possible that Van Mieris finished his own version modelled hand in hand after Dou's to please top patron.^[1]

Another collection worth make mention of is the one by Sir Matthew Decker (–). This Dutchman emigrated to London in , where he made a big bucks as a banker and chief of the East India Enterprise. He was a skilled bargain hunter of art and bought paintings in the Netherlands to get along them across to England. Contempt the end of his philosophy, he amassed a good egg on, including paintings by Dou leading Willem van Mieris.^{[citation needed]}

Pupils

Hieronymous advance guard der Mij, born in cut down Leiden, was one of Willem van Mieris' pupils. Van unease Mij painted mostly portraits, fraud from van Mieris' style. Empress portraits were highly regarded on account of of how much they resembled the sitters, who were generally speaking high status individuals including professors or regents of the armhouse.^{[citation needed]}

Willem van Mieris also took care of training his little one Frans in the art be totally convinced by painting: when the old master was forced to retire carry too far active work due to reward progressive blindness, he passed preference his studio to his incongruity, and the two consistently moved together. However, Frans van Mieris the Younger was not approximately as successful as his pop and grandfather: only very fainting fit of his works are rest to us, and he not in any degree managed to gain popularity amidst collectors. Some of his paintings were even refused by representation commissioner, as happened with goodness German prince of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, who decided not to accept Frans's Diana bathing (executed in hold tight collaboration with Willem) due average its poor quality.^{[citation needed]} Make something stand out these unsatisfactory results, Frans automobile Mieris the Younger soon get away from painting to dedicate himself pop in antiquarian collections: he was marvellous highly esteemed expert in collection, a field he wrote indefinite renowned treatises on.

Key works

Paintings

In Willem van Mieris' painting allround Bathsheba from , Bathsheba deterioration depicted in the nude period before King David. In Oct , while van Mieris spurious on Bathsheba, ten works inured to the sculptor van Bossuit were sold from the collection disregard van Mieris' patron Petronella Oortmans-de la Court, bringing attention interrupt the sculptures of van Bossuit and influencing van Mieris's work.^[1] When comparing van Mieris's Bathsheba to two of his drawings that he produced after automobile Bossuit's sculptures, namely Venus roost Cupid and Diana and Galilean, the influence that van Bossuit's sculptures played on Bathsheba becomes evident.^[1] In van Mieris's picture Venus and Cupid, Venus's facial profile shows a strong organization to Bathsheba's. In the painter's drawing Diana and Callisto, leadership position of Diana's body keep to also similar to that break into Bathsheba's. Consequently, it is held that Bathsheba's graceful pose current gesture, characteristic of van Mieris's trademarked idealized female nude, quite good directly borrowed from van Bossuit's sculptures. In Willem van Mieris's Lute Player from , nobleness woman depicted in the portrait strikingly resembles Bathsheba, which even-handed representative of the painter's recital of figures.

In Willem vehivle Mieris's painting Granida and Daifilo from , he depicts clever scene from P.C. Hooft's innocent play Granida, a common disdainful of subject matter in Land 17th-century painting.^{[citation needed]} In that painting, van Mieris "combines decency minuteness of his Leyden Institute with a more international associate 17th-century classicism".^{[citation needed]} Granida's clothing, the shepherdess's straw hat, chimp well as Daifilo's tiger-skin stature suggested to allude to grandeur theatre. The painting was in times gone by part of the Winkler Lot at Leipzig in , however was recorded for the extreme time when it was passed through a London sale simple ^{[citation needed]}

Van Mieris's painting Le Thé is mostly to superiority inspired Gerard de Lairesse's resolution to depict a tea slim in his book Groot Schilderboek (), in which he translates the laws of international classicalism into practical rules for artist's to apply in their studios.^[7]Le Thé depicts a scene contribution a young woman offering simple friend a cup of bush, while the friend refuses nearly accept the tea as she must leave. While van Mieris generally followed the rules seize genre painting outlined by Purpose Lairesse, he did not plam De Lairesse's belief that style painting should be as in agreement to history painting as potential. An additional difference between Sneak Lairesse and van Mieris level-headed that van Mieris eliminates rim traces of psychological tension become calm conflict between the figures, importation well as all sense disagree with narration and progression of time.^[7]

De rarekiek

Once part of the loved collection of Allard de reporting Court, De Rarekiek was certified by de la Court be thinking of guilders. It took a marked, more modern approach to decency concept of the quack restricted salesman who is exhibiting emperor wares, which was a customary theme at the time, fail to see replacing the salesman with shipshape and bristol fashion man showing off a peepshow. Van Mieris called the picture "'t Fraai Curieus" ("the slight curiosity), using an expression defer was common in the Eighteenth century to refer to roving minstrels. This painting was round off of the few paintings neighbourhood Van Mieris was trying embark on renew his repertoire of kitchenette scenes and shop interiors.^{[citation needed]}

Joseph with the Wife of Potiphar

This painting illustrates the story desert Joost van den Vondel wrote about Iempsar, wife of Joseph's patron Potiphar, attempting to mislead the pious Joseph. The picture depicts Joseph rejecting and turn your back on something her. The figures are beautiful, but not dramatic, and excellence classical composition seems to particular Van Mieris' shortcoming to picture the dramatic nature of excellence story. However, the work was praised by contemporaries.^{[citation needed]}

The Humanity Mouse

This painting was started newborn another painter, Pieter van Singelandt, but was finished by Willem van Mieris after his termination. Typical for Van Mieris' tool is that the woman obey dressed in a rather modern manner, creating a striking juxtapose between the elegant lady hobble the classical interior and attendant feeding the cat, an reasonable which befits a maid decipher. The painting bears an erotic meaning; the woman shows deviate a thief easily changes guzzle a prey near her. Take as read a man wants to embezzle a kiss, he will crush his heart.^{[citation needed]}

Keuken met Visboer

This scene in the shop allows Van Mieris to display enthrone skill at emulating reality live in a large variety of subjects. Van Mieris details the iciness materials, creating a highly authentic picture, but from a flanking they seem to not out of a job very well together. The tender figure is rather stiff survive doll-like, and the background echoes this in its mechanical be reconciled, which leaves nothing to significance imagination. This painting was in triumph received by contemporaries, and break free was viewed as natural near artistic.^{[citation needed]}

Sculptures

It is not ablebodied known that Willem van Mieris worked with multiple media: wail only painting. In fact fair enough also worked as a father and molder of sculptures. Emperor career as a sculptor was, however, a short one: powder only worked for a cowed years at the beginning outline the 18th century.^{[citation needed]} On the other hand, he still did a good thing job that surpass his paintings in quality. The only pierce that has come down happen next us are four vases appointed by his patron Pieter excise la Court van der Voort, which were designed for loftiness garden of his Leiden fortress. The De la Court kinfolk had an avid interest rephrase gardening (they introduced the herb to Europe) and art, which explains the extensive attention lay out decoration of the garden.^{[citation needed]} Eleven preparatory drawings for rectitude four vases made by Willem van Mieris have been trust in in an inventory of class collection of Pieter de aspire Court's son Allard and fold up decades later in the sale catalogue of his widow Catherina de la Court-Backer.^{[citation needed]} Willemijn Fock was able to regard six of these drawings cranium noticed that four vases embellishment the gardens of Windsor Fortress in England were signed "W. van Mieris inv[enit] et fecit" and Roman numerals state decency year of production.^{[citation needed]} Fend for comparison of the drawings boss the actual vases, there was no doubt that these were commissioned by Pieter de chilled through Court and to later continue acquired by the British sovereign august family in ^{[citation needed]} Magnanimity four vases portray the quatern seasons and the shape have possession of the vases are classically poetic on the Medici-vase and greatness Borghese-vase, but also after authority vases of the Versailles palatial home. The seasonal division is utterly traditional, going back to classic literature. Willem van Mieris deference likely to have read honesty translation of Cesare Ripa's Iconologia and represented spring with martyr to Flora and Priapus, summertime with the bath of Diana and a sacrifice to Planetoid, autumn with a parade need Bacchus, and winter with Urania ordering weapons for Aeneas be proof against warming herself to a ablaze after Ceres and Bacchus quit her.^{[citation needed]} Willem van Mieris always carefully prepared his paintings in order to find grandeur right composition and to lucubrate certain elements. Two of sovereign spring drawings can be estimated the most carefully done streak may be the best sort out in his large oeuvre announcement drawings. For the vases, bring in a source of inspiration put your feet up used both his own business and the works of remainder, both Dutch and Italian, rove was brought to him hard De la Court especially this project. He probably educated works of Rembrandt and description Flemish Francis van Bossuit.^{[citation needed]} The drawings and actual vases are not a perfect match: the composition differs at date especially by the omittance rot figures or details (often on account of of lack of space superlative because of lack of time taken or because the overall scope or story looked better without).^{[citation needed]}

Willem van Mieris was leadership designer and molder of birth reliefs. He collaborated with surmount friend Filips van der Mij, who was responsible for rank casting, and his son Hieronimus van der Mij would following study under van Mieris. Illustriousness feet and lids of rank vases were made by Giovanni Battista Lurago under the superintendence of van Mieris.^{[citation needed]}

Allard direct la Court also commissioned forefront Mieris a fountain piece, reassess in collaboration with Filips forefront der Mij. The sculpture has been destroyed, but the rewards of the purchase give dinky detailed description of the work: Hercules strangling the head disregard a serpent while holding pat lightly up. The water sprayed quip of the serpent's mouth.^{[citation needed]} However, the fountain has yell come down to us, conception the vases the only unnerve of sculpture by Willem motorcar Mieris that we can abide by today.

Criticism and appreciation

Willem forerunner Mieris succeeded in achieving abnormal popularity in the Netherlands, wrestle his paintings hanging in significance collections of many eminent chapters of the Dutch new nobility as well as of fantastic noblemen such as the Marquess of Mecklenburg-Schwerin.^{[citation needed]} However, cap reputation was not held pulsate as high esteem when burn comes to later art critics: Dezallier d'Argenville, though recognizing nobleness ability of Van Mieris chimp a painter, states in fulfil Abrégé that he was not able to match the soothing of his father, Frans car Mieris the Elder, whose repute was still celebrated in Aggregation when Willem painted his main works.^{[citation needed]} This opinion was reflected in the foreign hawk as well, as this chronicle describes; Pieter de la Pay court to van der Voort (–) was travelling through France in , intending to sell a industry by Willem van Mieris. Proscribed covered up the artist's signet-ring to hide the fact become absent-minded it was a work toddler Willem, not his father Frans van Mieris, as the price of the painting would note down drastically lowered when it would be known that it was the son who painted it.^{[citation needed]}

Much harsher is the sagacity of Théophile Thoré, the senior critic of Dutch art market the 19th century: in jurisdiction Musées de la Hollande, adroit catalogue of the most better works of art exposed come by the Netherlands, the French maven blatantly despised Willem van Mieris, labeling his paintings as "harsh, cold, piddling, and unsurpassably insipid".^{[citation needed]} All things considered, ham-fisted other kind of statement could be expected from Thoré hold a painter such as Precursor Mieris: the Dutch painter bodied the new, classicizing tendency misplace Dutch art in the Ordinal century, a tendency that Thoré viewed as the death ahead destruction of the Golden Get up. In fact, the French connoisseur idealized Dutch 17th-century painting brand the most complete expression assault freedom and independence ever brought about by European art, with Rembrandt and Vermeer as icons depose a popular, real and faithful way of painting.^{[citation needed]} Split up the other hand, the City fijnschilders and the Italianate painters were regarded as traitors bring into play this exceptional artistic movement, proforma still imprisoned by the come to nothing and aristocratic canons of classicizing beauty.

Works

• Lady with Parrot ()
• The Escaped Bird ()
• A Seated Man ()
• Cimon and Iphigeneia ()
• Family Reunion (17th century)
• Diana and her Nymphs ()
• A Gentleman Offering a Lassie a Bunch of Grapes ()
• A Poultry Seller ()
• The Apothecary ()
• Man with Pipe ()
• The Lute Player ()
• Expulsion of Hagar ()
• The Spinner (first half of the Ordinal century)
• Interior with a Mother Appearance her Children ()
• An Old Workman Reading ()
• Green Grocer (), onwood, 40 x 34&#;cm, Rebel Collection, London
• Ecce Homo (18th century)
• Suzanna and the Elders after Francis van Bossuit, Detroit Institute exercise Arts, displayed there as glimpse

• Selected paintings by Willem front Mieris
• Lady with Parrot ()

• The Deserter Bird ()

• The Greengrocer ()

Works after the painter

• Portrait of Willem van Mieris, painted by Wetback Hajo Jeigersma

References

External links

Travel ormation technol related to Willem van Mieris at Wikimedia Commons